The impending ban on American XL bullies in the UK has triggered a contentious debate, with proponents facing abuse at home, work, and online. The UK government’s decision to include the breed in the list of banned dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, citing a surge in attacks and fatalities, has led to a polarized discussion within society.
Starting from December 31, it will be illegal to sell, abandon, or let stray an XL bully, and from February 1, ownership without a certificate of exemption will be a criminal offense in England and Wales. While animal welfare groups argue against the ban, claiming it hasn’t curbed attacks, organizations like the Centre for Evidence-Based Regulation of Dangerous Dogs (CEBRDD) emphasize evidence suggesting the breed’s propensity for violence.
CEBRDD’s research indicates that, although XL bullies represent less than 1% of UK dogs, they accounted for 44% of attacks in 2023 and 75% of deaths in the last three years. However, those advocating for the ban, including academics and professionals supporting CEBRDD, report facing significant abuse, both online and in professional spaces.
Benedict Treolar, CEBRDD co-founder, expressed concerns about the targeted harassment faced by individuals advocating for the ban. Threats, false pretenses, and online bullying have become prevalent, affecting even those connected to dog attack victims. Treolar describes the situation as a “weird culture war” involving animal welfare groups, pro-hunting organizations, and individuals viewing dangerous dogs as status pets.
Despite YouGov polling indicating 57% public support for the ban, critics argue against breed-specific legislation. The Dog Control Coalition, comprising organizations like the RSPCA, Blue Cross, and the Kennel Club, raises serious concerns about the short compliance timeline and doubts about the efficacy of breed-specific bans based on historical data.
Amid logistical challenges in defining the breed and ensuring veterinary capacity for mandatory procedures, the ban’s critics question its effectiveness. The Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs affirms its commitment to the ban and emphasizes ongoing efforts to protect the public. The controversy reflects a complex societal debate over dog breeds, safety measures, and the impact of legislation on pet ownership.
